Winged_Wolf
03-23-2007, 05:02 PM
EliteSinkes
11-07-2005, 11:43 PM
So I've been up to psionics for about two years and im a basic to intermediate in energy manipulation, and psychic work. Also I've been "meddling" in telekinesis, cryokinesis, and electrokinesis. I think electrokinesis is the wisest to start with and work with completely because you are working with energy and your bioelectricity inside of you and moving it around which is the basis of psionics. So anyway can anyone give me some techniques other than what im getting from wingmakers and such. Also is this a good place to start in kinetics or should i just go to telekinesis?
DanielH
11-08-2005, 12:26 AM
First of all... never use anything from wingmakers. They're fluffy, they plagerize, and they don't have anything worthwhile. The second thing is that all "kinesis" are just terms for "psychokinesis." I'm not sure how the Guild classifies these things though.
Anyway... just do telekinesis. If you want to work with "electricity" I suggest you work with psi. Psi has been known to fry circuits and have the ability to shock people a bit :).
What do you want to do with "electrokinesis" anyway?
EliteSinkes
11-08-2005, 04:26 AM
wow i came off as a fluffy person didnt i?......well im not really sure why i want to learn any of these kinesis's because what do they do really? i mean a person can move stuff after some time but honestly what do you get out of it?
i guess im just trying to expand my knowledge/abilities to something physical.
DanielH
11-08-2005, 04:57 AM
MicroPK tends to be really pointless, even after years upon years of practice. If I was you I'd go for something practical, Why did you say you're doing psionics?
EliteSinkes
11-08-2005, 05:02 AM
well im doing psionics because i feel closer to my own truth and for my spiritual growth. then i also want to do psychokinesis to expand my knowledge but i just want to know what it is used for except for the thrill of saying "hey watch this"
DanielH
11-08-2005, 05:29 AM
MicroPK isn't really used for anything other than that. You should really have some goals in mind before you start practicing psionics. You don't want to waste time :/.
If you want spiritual growth... go read a bible or koran or something.
Anonymous
11-08-2005, 08:13 AM
DH, shut up.
Psycho-kinesis is a genertic term that means a phsyical effect achived by psi.
Electro-kinesis is a specailized form of such.
Cyro-kinesis is a load of crap.
Mirco-kinesis does NOT directly effect computers, beciase they are computers. Mirco-kinesis effects random systems.
DanielH
11-08-2005, 08:47 AM
Yeah... I sort of thought that was self-explanatory... the PK thing and all.
Can you do anything with "electrokinesis"?
What do you mean cryokinesis is crap? Are you telling me we can't excite (or... deexcite) atoms and molecules to make things hot and cold?
Micro-PK DOES directly effect computer systems. It's what you would call "electrokinesis". That's why it can be used for so many different things. Saying that it doesn't effect computers because they're computers is a shit arguement. Considering computers can be programed to come up with random sequences... well, take a guess at what Micro-PK can do :)
Winged_Wolf
11-08-2005, 09:43 AM
Actually, computers can't be programmed to come up with random sequences--just complex ones. They're not truly random.
DanielH
11-08-2005, 10:11 AM
According to the dictionary something that has a 50% 50% chance is considered random.
"Of or relating to an event in which all outcomes are equally likely, as in the testing of a blood sample for the presence of a substance."
Even the other definitions support that.
Winged_Wolf
11-08-2005, 10:23 AM
Computers use complex algorithms to produce supposedly random numbers. They don't produce truly random numbers.
EliteSinkes
11-08-2005, 01:32 PM
i didnt mean spiritual growth as in religion for that is spiritual brainwashing. :lol: but i meant the growth and knowledge of my energetic and other bodies.....i find that a nice reason to do psionics.
I dont believe Cryokinesis can be a "load of crap" because you slow molecules down and then the kinetic energy lessens and the friction between the molecules lessen therefore making it cold.....
Unfortunatly nothing can truly be as random as it seems there always has to be a reason behind it like in a number generator maybe its told to pick 3 every 5362 times therefore making seem random.
DanielH
11-08-2005, 02:28 PM
Wolf: Look up the meaning of random. Anything that has an equal chance of coming out as any other thing is considered random. A range of number from 1-2 can be random.
Anonymous
11-08-2005, 05:06 PM
Micro-kinesis is a general term, like PK.
It refers to the effect, not the cause.
Effecting the outcome of rolling dice is part of the definition of micro-pk. Do you think you are effecting electrons in the dice to achieve the effect? Or are you effecting the kinetic energy? Or is it some odd quantum aspect that effects probability?
In using the definition of electro-kinesis you are specifying that you are effecting the electrons and flow of such.
How does applying energy to a system make it COLDER? Cold is lack of heat, which is the most basic form of kinetic energy. Applying energy tot a system does not make the heat go away. Plus the enrgy you disrupt is not gone; it is merely transformed into another type of energy.
See thread Pyrokinetic Functioning.
EliteSinkes
11-08-2005, 11:05 PM
then by your example......taking away energy would make it colder therefore cryokinesis :lol:
DanielH
11-08-2005, 11:31 PM
The way you use MicroPK in a sentence determines how it's refered to.
As for how it works? No idea. I wish I did though. This also comes down to what you're doing with it.
Er... yeah... slowing down atoms and molecules is what makes things colder... that's what was said. Taking away energy or stopping it and all...
Winged_Wolf
11-08-2005, 11:33 PM
Computers aren't capable of making a random choice, Daniel. Again, they use a complex algorithm to produce numbers, and there is not a 50/50 or any other chance of anything involved. There is NO chance involved. The numbers are produced via the algorithm, which someone skilled enough in mathematics could figure out and use to get the same results.
johngault22
11-09-2005, 12:07 AM
but what if you used more than one processor, which are switched on at different times by one or more people, wouldn't that create a truly random system?
Sol
11-09-2005, 02:29 AM
When compared, they'd look random. However, like WW said, you could use the algorithms and figure it out. They're just two of the same thing working independently of eachother.
EliteSinkes
11-09-2005, 02:35 AM
nothing can be truly random.....to be random it would have to be created out of thin air with no prior thought. Basically nothing can be trully random because there is always a reason why it happen and it can be trace through a pattern
Sol
11-09-2005, 02:56 AM
Yes, that's exactly the way I think of it, EliteSinkes. Everything comes from something that can be found out through a pattern, so nothing can truly be 'random', as we like to call it. Randomness is technically an impossibility. There's even some eastern schools of swordfighting that emphasize being able to know what your enemy is going to do with almost abolute certianty before he even knows, based on how they act in and out of battle. The only pitfall to the randomness argument would be quantum physics. That could very well be random (or is it?).
Anonymous
11-09-2005, 03:44 AM
OH THE FUCK DO YOU TAKE AWAY ENERGY BY ADDING IT?!?!?!
I have allready explained, more then once whay it does not owrk. Simply repsonding with an unthought out answer that does not apply to laws of physics is a waste a time.
EliteSinkes
11-09-2005, 03:48 AM
ok well i dont know about anyone else but either you take energy out of something and it makes it colder....or you look at things in a molecular level and slow its own kinetic energy down which make the friction between the two lessen therefore decreasing temperature......its not impossible.....nothing is impossible...it is just not known. Now for me its real because of the expierences ive had such as a room getting dramatically colder than it was (no the a/c wasnt on) and others but im not going to preach to a brick wall so there.
Anonymous
11-09-2005, 03:56 AM
So your basing this entire thing off your perception of cold?
Did you even use a therometer?
EliteSinkes
11-09-2005, 04:01 AM
no and no. I didnt use a thermometer because we didnt have one but people who entered the room mentioned that it was colder and found it strange since its the warmest room in the house.
But like i said im not going to fight with you. You can have your beliefs and i can have mine.
Winged_Wolf
11-09-2005, 04:03 AM
This simply requires more empirical testing, otherwise it's just a bunch of people arguing about what's possible. Go, prove it's possible, or that it's not, and end the argument.
If the room doesn't register colder on a thermometer, but people mention it feels colder, then most likely what is happening is programming the energy to implant the idea of "coldness" in their mind...transmitting a sensation to them, rather than affecting the temperature of the room.
Both possiblities are interesting. Find out which one it is.
EliteSinkes
11-09-2005, 04:08 AM
since im a super novice to kinesis abilities i wont be able to truly prove it for a bit of time but o well im not going to loose sleep over being told im wrong.
DanielH
11-09-2005, 06:28 AM
Forget the random thing, it doesn't matter. It's just bullshit semantics now. Who cares about that.
From the looks of it... Elite is right. He keeps saying taking energy away to make it colder. Maybe I'm missing something though. Can someone quote where he said you have to add more energy to make it cool down?
Magician Of Black Chaos
11-09-2005, 08:03 AM
then by your example......taking away energy would make it colder therefore cryokinesis :lol:
Taking away energy makes energy colder? Then may I ask what are you making cold if you take away the energy? It takes energy period to get to those points there is no negative "-" only positive "+" to draw foward not backwards to achieve however.. Slowing and deducting are 2 different things to specify from each other...
DanielH
11-09-2005, 08:10 AM
It doesn't make the energy colder, it makes the object colder. You're changing the energy from one form to another... the object is still there though.
Magician Of Black Chaos
11-09-2005, 08:19 AM
It doesn't make the energy colder, it makes the object colder. You're changing the energy from one form to another... the object is still there though.
Ah, I get your point..
EliteSinkes
11-09-2005, 01:38 PM
thats what i meant.....by taking the energy away from an object then the friction between the molecules would lessen making it colder.
Winged_Wolf
11-09-2005, 11:16 PM
I had envisioned some means of conducting the energy away, or distributing it.
Oipo
11-10-2005, 06:55 PM
Another example would be our water cooker, it just guides masses of electricity through some iron stuff at the bottom, thus generating heat, thus warming the water.
Winged_Wolf
11-11-2005, 12:18 AM
Heating things up is easier than cooling them down.
Anonymous
11-11-2005, 08:11 AM
"thats what i meant.....by taking the energy away from an object then the friction between the molecules would lessen making it colder."
How are you "takeing energy away"? We are talking about kinetic energy here. Not sub-atomic particles that can do work.
You have to add sub-atomic particles that do work to the system, effectively adding enrgy to the ssystem. How in that are you going to not make more heat? Energy breaks down into simplier forms of energy. Movement becomes sound or vibartion or heat. sound or vibration become heat. Heat does not break down, it mostly moves around. Heat can becomee a more complex form, succh as sound vibration or movment; but that happens less often then the other way around.
Winged_Wolf
11-11-2005, 09:13 AM
Conducting it.
DanielH
11-12-2005, 05:01 AM
Changing it from one form of energy to another
Sol
11-12-2005, 05:18 AM
That would probably produce at least a little bit of heat, I'd think.
Pavlov's Dog
11-13-2005, 08:01 PM
id also like to add that if you used energy to take away the friction between molecules on an atomic or subatomic level, you would actually be releasing more energy and transforming it to a subliquid or subgaseous state of matter.
XPWarrior3
07-26-2006, 06:12 PM
Okay, back to electro-kinesis. Does anyone know any techniques for creating sparks? I've done this before, and I stopped, now I want to do it again and the old techniques that I used don't seem to be working for me. I'm interested in hearing different ideas and techniques.
WolfRaider
07-26-2006, 09:08 PM
Well, you could tell us the techniques that you used and we could try them and, perhaps, refine them or try something new.
XPWarrior3
07-27-2006, 04:01 PM
In the technique I used I visualized sparks in my field and and I visualized them become more in number, then I tried to feel the sparks and then hear them. That is the technique I used when I first started.
Another one that I used, which is still useful is the one that ANKA told me. To project energy from my sternum and as the energy is absorbed by the equipment that I want to affect, I visualize the desired effect occuring. This technique still works for me and my television. I can turn on and off the reception. What I'm really aiming to do is both this technique and create sparks also by will.
I tried using that first technique, but its not giving me the results that it gave when I first started using it. I just came in hope of some new ideas.
Thanks for answering my post WolfRaider.
Anazrieth
07-27-2006, 08:31 PM
ok put on some fuzzy socks..... rub your feet back and forth really fast while vizualizing sparks.... after about 4 minutes of this... go touch something....
XPWarrior3
08-01-2006, 09:26 PM
Lol.. I'll definitely try that. I haven't done it before.
Tosharu
11-21-2006, 09:43 PM
ok put on some fuzzy socks..... rub your feet back and forth really fast while vizualizing sparks.... after about 4 minutes of this... go touch something....
That's awesome! I used to do that all the time when I was like five. I used to shock everyone with static. XD It used to annoy everyone.
My brother, Cousin, and I used to have "shock wars" when we were younger. It was alot of fun.
It's funny though this technically isn't psi-related. But still very funny!
11-07-2005, 11:43 PM
So I've been up to psionics for about two years and im a basic to intermediate in energy manipulation, and psychic work. Also I've been "meddling" in telekinesis, cryokinesis, and electrokinesis. I think electrokinesis is the wisest to start with and work with completely because you are working with energy and your bioelectricity inside of you and moving it around which is the basis of psionics. So anyway can anyone give me some techniques other than what im getting from wingmakers and such. Also is this a good place to start in kinetics or should i just go to telekinesis?
DanielH
11-08-2005, 12:26 AM
First of all... never use anything from wingmakers. They're fluffy, they plagerize, and they don't have anything worthwhile. The second thing is that all "kinesis" are just terms for "psychokinesis." I'm not sure how the Guild classifies these things though.
Anyway... just do telekinesis. If you want to work with "electricity" I suggest you work with psi. Psi has been known to fry circuits and have the ability to shock people a bit :).
What do you want to do with "electrokinesis" anyway?
EliteSinkes
11-08-2005, 04:26 AM
wow i came off as a fluffy person didnt i?......well im not really sure why i want to learn any of these kinesis's because what do they do really? i mean a person can move stuff after some time but honestly what do you get out of it?
i guess im just trying to expand my knowledge/abilities to something physical.
DanielH
11-08-2005, 04:57 AM
MicroPK tends to be really pointless, even after years upon years of practice. If I was you I'd go for something practical, Why did you say you're doing psionics?
EliteSinkes
11-08-2005, 05:02 AM
well im doing psionics because i feel closer to my own truth and for my spiritual growth. then i also want to do psychokinesis to expand my knowledge but i just want to know what it is used for except for the thrill of saying "hey watch this"
DanielH
11-08-2005, 05:29 AM
MicroPK isn't really used for anything other than that. You should really have some goals in mind before you start practicing psionics. You don't want to waste time :/.
If you want spiritual growth... go read a bible or koran or something.
Anonymous
11-08-2005, 08:13 AM
DH, shut up.
Psycho-kinesis is a genertic term that means a phsyical effect achived by psi.
Electro-kinesis is a specailized form of such.
Cyro-kinesis is a load of crap.
Mirco-kinesis does NOT directly effect computers, beciase they are computers. Mirco-kinesis effects random systems.
DanielH
11-08-2005, 08:47 AM
Yeah... I sort of thought that was self-explanatory... the PK thing and all.
Can you do anything with "electrokinesis"?
What do you mean cryokinesis is crap? Are you telling me we can't excite (or... deexcite) atoms and molecules to make things hot and cold?
Micro-PK DOES directly effect computer systems. It's what you would call "electrokinesis". That's why it can be used for so many different things. Saying that it doesn't effect computers because they're computers is a shit arguement. Considering computers can be programed to come up with random sequences... well, take a guess at what Micro-PK can do :)
Winged_Wolf
11-08-2005, 09:43 AM
Actually, computers can't be programmed to come up with random sequences--just complex ones. They're not truly random.
DanielH
11-08-2005, 10:11 AM
According to the dictionary something that has a 50% 50% chance is considered random.
"Of or relating to an event in which all outcomes are equally likely, as in the testing of a blood sample for the presence of a substance."
Even the other definitions support that.
Winged_Wolf
11-08-2005, 10:23 AM
Computers use complex algorithms to produce supposedly random numbers. They don't produce truly random numbers.
EliteSinkes
11-08-2005, 01:32 PM
i didnt mean spiritual growth as in religion for that is spiritual brainwashing. :lol: but i meant the growth and knowledge of my energetic and other bodies.....i find that a nice reason to do psionics.
I dont believe Cryokinesis can be a "load of crap" because you slow molecules down and then the kinetic energy lessens and the friction between the molecules lessen therefore making it cold.....
Unfortunatly nothing can truly be as random as it seems there always has to be a reason behind it like in a number generator maybe its told to pick 3 every 5362 times therefore making seem random.
DanielH
11-08-2005, 02:28 PM
Wolf: Look up the meaning of random. Anything that has an equal chance of coming out as any other thing is considered random. A range of number from 1-2 can be random.
Anonymous
11-08-2005, 05:06 PM
Micro-kinesis is a general term, like PK.
It refers to the effect, not the cause.
Effecting the outcome of rolling dice is part of the definition of micro-pk. Do you think you are effecting electrons in the dice to achieve the effect? Or are you effecting the kinetic energy? Or is it some odd quantum aspect that effects probability?
In using the definition of electro-kinesis you are specifying that you are effecting the electrons and flow of such.
How does applying energy to a system make it COLDER? Cold is lack of heat, which is the most basic form of kinetic energy. Applying energy tot a system does not make the heat go away. Plus the enrgy you disrupt is not gone; it is merely transformed into another type of energy.
See thread Pyrokinetic Functioning.
EliteSinkes
11-08-2005, 11:05 PM
then by your example......taking away energy would make it colder therefore cryokinesis :lol:
DanielH
11-08-2005, 11:31 PM
The way you use MicroPK in a sentence determines how it's refered to.
As for how it works? No idea. I wish I did though. This also comes down to what you're doing with it.
Er... yeah... slowing down atoms and molecules is what makes things colder... that's what was said. Taking away energy or stopping it and all...
Winged_Wolf
11-08-2005, 11:33 PM
Computers aren't capable of making a random choice, Daniel. Again, they use a complex algorithm to produce numbers, and there is not a 50/50 or any other chance of anything involved. There is NO chance involved. The numbers are produced via the algorithm, which someone skilled enough in mathematics could figure out and use to get the same results.
johngault22
11-09-2005, 12:07 AM
but what if you used more than one processor, which are switched on at different times by one or more people, wouldn't that create a truly random system?
Sol
11-09-2005, 02:29 AM
When compared, they'd look random. However, like WW said, you could use the algorithms and figure it out. They're just two of the same thing working independently of eachother.
EliteSinkes
11-09-2005, 02:35 AM
nothing can be truly random.....to be random it would have to be created out of thin air with no prior thought. Basically nothing can be trully random because there is always a reason why it happen and it can be trace through a pattern
Sol
11-09-2005, 02:56 AM
Yes, that's exactly the way I think of it, EliteSinkes. Everything comes from something that can be found out through a pattern, so nothing can truly be 'random', as we like to call it. Randomness is technically an impossibility. There's even some eastern schools of swordfighting that emphasize being able to know what your enemy is going to do with almost abolute certianty before he even knows, based on how they act in and out of battle. The only pitfall to the randomness argument would be quantum physics. That could very well be random (or is it?).
Anonymous
11-09-2005, 03:44 AM
OH THE FUCK DO YOU TAKE AWAY ENERGY BY ADDING IT?!?!?!
I have allready explained, more then once whay it does not owrk. Simply repsonding with an unthought out answer that does not apply to laws of physics is a waste a time.
EliteSinkes
11-09-2005, 03:48 AM
ok well i dont know about anyone else but either you take energy out of something and it makes it colder....or you look at things in a molecular level and slow its own kinetic energy down which make the friction between the two lessen therefore decreasing temperature......its not impossible.....nothing is impossible...it is just not known. Now for me its real because of the expierences ive had such as a room getting dramatically colder than it was (no the a/c wasnt on) and others but im not going to preach to a brick wall so there.
Anonymous
11-09-2005, 03:56 AM
So your basing this entire thing off your perception of cold?
Did you even use a therometer?
EliteSinkes
11-09-2005, 04:01 AM
no and no. I didnt use a thermometer because we didnt have one but people who entered the room mentioned that it was colder and found it strange since its the warmest room in the house.
But like i said im not going to fight with you. You can have your beliefs and i can have mine.
Winged_Wolf
11-09-2005, 04:03 AM
This simply requires more empirical testing, otherwise it's just a bunch of people arguing about what's possible. Go, prove it's possible, or that it's not, and end the argument.
If the room doesn't register colder on a thermometer, but people mention it feels colder, then most likely what is happening is programming the energy to implant the idea of "coldness" in their mind...transmitting a sensation to them, rather than affecting the temperature of the room.
Both possiblities are interesting. Find out which one it is.
EliteSinkes
11-09-2005, 04:08 AM
since im a super novice to kinesis abilities i wont be able to truly prove it for a bit of time but o well im not going to loose sleep over being told im wrong.
DanielH
11-09-2005, 06:28 AM
Forget the random thing, it doesn't matter. It's just bullshit semantics now. Who cares about that.
From the looks of it... Elite is right. He keeps saying taking energy away to make it colder. Maybe I'm missing something though. Can someone quote where he said you have to add more energy to make it cool down?
Magician Of Black Chaos
11-09-2005, 08:03 AM
then by your example......taking away energy would make it colder therefore cryokinesis :lol:
Taking away energy makes energy colder? Then may I ask what are you making cold if you take away the energy? It takes energy period to get to those points there is no negative "-" only positive "+" to draw foward not backwards to achieve however.. Slowing and deducting are 2 different things to specify from each other...
DanielH
11-09-2005, 08:10 AM
It doesn't make the energy colder, it makes the object colder. You're changing the energy from one form to another... the object is still there though.
Magician Of Black Chaos
11-09-2005, 08:19 AM
It doesn't make the energy colder, it makes the object colder. You're changing the energy from one form to another... the object is still there though.
Ah, I get your point..
EliteSinkes
11-09-2005, 01:38 PM
thats what i meant.....by taking the energy away from an object then the friction between the molecules would lessen making it colder.
Winged_Wolf
11-09-2005, 11:16 PM
I had envisioned some means of conducting the energy away, or distributing it.
Oipo
11-10-2005, 06:55 PM
Another example would be our water cooker, it just guides masses of electricity through some iron stuff at the bottom, thus generating heat, thus warming the water.
Winged_Wolf
11-11-2005, 12:18 AM
Heating things up is easier than cooling them down.
Anonymous
11-11-2005, 08:11 AM
"thats what i meant.....by taking the energy away from an object then the friction between the molecules would lessen making it colder."
How are you "takeing energy away"? We are talking about kinetic energy here. Not sub-atomic particles that can do work.
You have to add sub-atomic particles that do work to the system, effectively adding enrgy to the ssystem. How in that are you going to not make more heat? Energy breaks down into simplier forms of energy. Movement becomes sound or vibartion or heat. sound or vibration become heat. Heat does not break down, it mostly moves around. Heat can becomee a more complex form, succh as sound vibration or movment; but that happens less often then the other way around.
Winged_Wolf
11-11-2005, 09:13 AM
Conducting it.
DanielH
11-12-2005, 05:01 AM
Changing it from one form of energy to another
Sol
11-12-2005, 05:18 AM
That would probably produce at least a little bit of heat, I'd think.
Pavlov's Dog
11-13-2005, 08:01 PM
id also like to add that if you used energy to take away the friction between molecules on an atomic or subatomic level, you would actually be releasing more energy and transforming it to a subliquid or subgaseous state of matter.
XPWarrior3
07-26-2006, 06:12 PM
Okay, back to electro-kinesis. Does anyone know any techniques for creating sparks? I've done this before, and I stopped, now I want to do it again and the old techniques that I used don't seem to be working for me. I'm interested in hearing different ideas and techniques.
WolfRaider
07-26-2006, 09:08 PM
Well, you could tell us the techniques that you used and we could try them and, perhaps, refine them or try something new.
XPWarrior3
07-27-2006, 04:01 PM
In the technique I used I visualized sparks in my field and and I visualized them become more in number, then I tried to feel the sparks and then hear them. That is the technique I used when I first started.
Another one that I used, which is still useful is the one that ANKA told me. To project energy from my sternum and as the energy is absorbed by the equipment that I want to affect, I visualize the desired effect occuring. This technique still works for me and my television. I can turn on and off the reception. What I'm really aiming to do is both this technique and create sparks also by will.
I tried using that first technique, but its not giving me the results that it gave when I first started using it. I just came in hope of some new ideas.
Thanks for answering my post WolfRaider.
Anazrieth
07-27-2006, 08:31 PM
ok put on some fuzzy socks..... rub your feet back and forth really fast while vizualizing sparks.... after about 4 minutes of this... go touch something....
XPWarrior3
08-01-2006, 09:26 PM
Lol.. I'll definitely try that. I haven't done it before.
Tosharu
11-21-2006, 09:43 PM
ok put on some fuzzy socks..... rub your feet back and forth really fast while vizualizing sparks.... after about 4 minutes of this... go touch something....
That's awesome! I used to do that all the time when I was like five. I used to shock everyone with static. XD It used to annoy everyone.
My brother, Cousin, and I used to have "shock wars" when we were younger. It was alot of fun.
It's funny though this technically isn't psi-related. But still very funny!